This practice aims to deepen the research base and understanding of the study area using interpretative techniques to substantiate the
observations identified in Exercise 1a, through mapping of the various components and systems. It should facilitate students to consider and consolidate these into clearly identifiable issues and to formally share their baseline evaluations with the peer group.
Faustine – Industrial Land Use // Civic Pride // Drainage
Joyce – Vertical Landscape // Urban Vegetation // Public Land Ownership
Jack – Urban Road Infrastructure
Hugo – Unwelcomed Facilities // Illegal Parking // Poor Connectivity
Sarah – Green Space // Open Space // Footbridge
Anna – Barriers
Yvonna – Illegal Dumping // Working Conditions // Ecology
Anson – Landscape of Impermanence // Leisure Space // Barriers
Peter – Culture // Atmosphere
Frances – Regional Function // Accessibility // Nature Conservation
Jerry – Under croft // Waterarea // Cemetery Area
AT – Temporary Working Space // Noise Pollution // Water Quality
Yoco – Land contamination // Community Infrastructure // Accessibility
Jay – Recycling Business // Illegal Dumping (residential waste) // Universal Accessibility
Carice – Discomfort // Consistent theme of death // Aesthetic Entropy
Klaus – Microclimate (Wind, urban heat island, noise)
Mandy – Lifestyle and working environment of workers // adaptation of nature in response to human activities // changes in animal behaviours
Agnes – Public Spaces // Separation of Spaces // Maintaining Vegetation
Penny – Acessibility // Plantings and Arts // Facilities
Sabrina – User Conflict // Recreation // Accessiblity